Sunday, January 2, 2011

More On the Ideal Scene

The ideal of a civilization should be a positive-feedback activity or progression, i.e. the more progress is made in the right direction, the more “pull” or inclination would exist to go further in the right direction.
Individuals who were relatively deaberrated in the area of groups would value a group with a high level of causation for its ability to act as a servo-mechanism to forward whatever self-determined purposes he may have in order to achieve self-determined goals. He would also understand that the driving force of group causation is always the competent application of self-determination by the individual within the framework of a coherent set of policy. He would feel it strongly in his interest to have available in the public as large a pool of self-determined potential group members as possible, all of whom would have a firm grasp on the set of basic group policies which would underlie the particular policy set or framework of any given group. This would allow more chance of there being enough competent group members to "salute" any purpose he wanted to "run up the flag pole".
When you add this all up it means that there would be a self-motivated desire by the individual for others to increase competency and respect for the right to apply competency. So, above a certain level of deaberration there would be a mutual desire to have others do well, but it would exist above the personal level. It would exist in the impersonal band of formal group participation, and be independent of personal like or dislike. This then allows the individual, as the civilization becomes less aberrated in the area of groups, to asymptotically approach complete control of his personal life by dealing only from an impersonal "hat" viewpoint with those he does not want to be part of it, while at the same time increasing his ability to forward his self-determined purposes to improve conditions in the larger sphere. It would also offer a paradigm through which those who may not like each other could still operate effectively within a given system of policies by adhering to their respective impersonal "hat" viewpoints.

No comments:

Post a Comment